You don't need more salespeople. You need deal orchestration.

A few months ago, I sat across from the CEO of a company doing about €40 million a year.

She told me she was going to hire three more salespeople to hit her growth target for the following year. It was an aggressive plan, but not an unreasonable one. The board wanted faster growth. The pipeline looked thin. The company had a handful of large opportunities that could change the year if they landed.

So I asked her a simple question.

“Who closed your last three important deals?”

She looked at me and said, “I did.”

Then I asked, “Who will close the next three?”

She paused.

Then she said, “I will.”

That was the real problem.

She did not have a sales hiring problem. She had a rainmaker dependency problem. More specifically, she had an orchestration problem.

A small number of people inside the company knew how to move the biggest deals forward. They knew which executives mattered. They knew which technical objections were real and which were theatre. They knew when procurement was posturing, when legal was nervous, and when the internal champion had quietly lost control of the process.

The company did not know how to scale that judgment.

So it did what many companies do. It tried to hire around the problem.

I have seen the same pattern again and again in companies selling complex B2B deals. These are not transactional software deals. They are contracts worth hundreds of thousands or millions of euros. Sales cycles run six to 18 months. The real market may consist of only 50 to 200 target accounts. Lose the wrong few, and there is no long tail to make up for it.

Inside these companies, the most important deals are usually closed by a founder, a head of sales, a technical visionary, or one unusually capable account executive. Everyone else works around them.

The board calls it a pipeline problem. The CEO calls it a hiring problem. The CRO calls it a scaling problem.

But the problem is usually more specific than that.

The company has not built the system around the deal.

The wrong fixes are familiar

When big deals stall, commercial leaders usually reach for one of five familiar solutions.

They buy sales training. They implement a methodology like MEDDIC, Challenger, Sandler, or Force Management. These can help. A seller who cannot qualify, discover, or negotiate properly needs training.

But training does not create a rainmaker in six months.

The rainmaker’s advantage is not just technique. It is pattern recognition. It is industry context. It is knowing that the person with the loudest title is not always the person with the most influence. It is knowing which objections matter, which committees are political, and which internal sponsor is strong enough to bet on.

You can teach a framework. You cannot quickly teach ten years of judgment.

Other companies buy account-based marketing platforms. Demandbase, 6sense, Terminus, HubSpot ABM, and others all solve real problems. They help sales and marketing organize around a defined list of accounts.

But in a complex deal, the account is not enough.

You do not need to “reach Siemens.” You need to reach the specific people inside Siemens who will shape the decision. The business owner. The finance lead. The legal stakeholder. The procurement manager. The technical evaluator. The regional executive with quiet veto power. The former consultant who has the CEO’s ear. The person who will never join the sales call but will influence the decision anyway.

Most ABM programs still operate at the account level. Complex deals are decided at the stakeholder level.

Then there is the CRM.

Salesforce, HubSpot, Gong, Apollo, ZoomInfo and similar tools are useful. Most serious companies need some version of them. They record activity, store contacts, track pipeline, surface intent, and organize commercial work.

But a CRM is a ledger. It tells you the score. It does not play the game.

It can tell you that a meeting happened. It cannot make the CFO familiar with your point of view three months before the business case reaches her desk. It can tell you that legal is involved. It cannot build trust with the legal stakeholder who is deciding whether you look like a risky vendor. It can tell you that procurement has entered the process. It cannot shape what procurement already believes about your category.

A fourth response is to hire an agency.

Agencies can produce good creative. They can run campaigns. Some are excellent. But most agencies operate on campaign logic: plan by quarter, brief by segment, measure by channel.

Complex deals require deal logic: plan by account, brief by stakeholder group, measure by movement inside a live opportunity.

Those are very different operating systems.

The fifth response is the most common: hire more salespeople.

This is often the most expensive mistake.

Senior sellers are costly. They take months to ramp. In a complex market, they may need a year before they fully understand the product, category, buyers, politics, and buying triggers.

Then the CEO discovers that the biggest deals are still being closed by the same two or three people as before.

This is not because the new hires are bad. It is because the company misunderstood the bottleneck.

The bottleneck was never simply “not enough sellers.”

The bottleneck was that the company had not built the infrastructure required to help more people win the most complex deals.

What the Fortune 500s know

Now compare that with how a Fortune 500 company approaches a major strategic account.

Not an ordinary account. A deal worth tens of millions. The kind of deal the CEO is watching.

Around that deal, the enterprise builds a machine.

Research teams map the account. They identify the decision-makers, influencers, blockers, committees, reporting lines, business pressures, investment priorities, and political dynamics.

Content teams shape the company’s point of view into reports, articles, presentations, videos, executive briefings, and industry narratives.

Media teams place that content in front of the right people across LinkedIn, business publications, YouTube, display, search, newsletters, and trade media.

Sales teams coordinate with marketing, executives, product specialists, technical experts, legal, finance, and customer references.

Analytics teams track engagement and movement.

Leadership stays close.

This is not “marketing support.” It is deal infrastructure.

In my experience working with more than 100 Fortune 500 companies on their largest accounts, this kind of orchestration can involve around 20 systems, several specialist roles, multiple agencies, and hundreds of thousands of euros a year in total cost around one major account.

That is the uncomfortable truth.

Large enterprises do not simply win because their products are better. Often, they are not. They win because by the time a buying group sits down to decide, the group already knows them.

The stakeholders have seen their thinking. They have heard their executives. They have read their arguments. They have absorbed their category narrative. They may not agree with all of it, but the company is familiar.

And in complex B2B, familiarity is not a soft advantage.

It is often the difference between being seriously considered and being politely evaluated before the buyer chooses the vendor it already trusts.

Bain published research in 2024 showing that in complex B2B purchases, 81% of buyers favor a vendor already known to the buying group at the start of the process.

That number should terrify challenger companies.

If your market has thousands of potential customers, you can afford to lose some. You can run more outbound, generate more leads, and keep feeding the machine.

But if your market has 150 accounts that matter, you cannot afford to be unknown when the buying process begins.

Being unknown is not a branding problem.

It is a revenue problem.

What orchestration actually means

Deal orchestration is the deliberate work of making your company known, understood, and trusted by the full buying group before and during the deal.

Not just by the champion.

Not just by the person who books the demo.

Not just by the executive your founder happens to know.

The full buying group.

That means mapping the people who will influence the decision, even if they never appear in the CRM. It means understanding what each stakeholder cares about. It means shaping different messages for the CFO, the business sponsor, the technical evaluator, procurement, legal, regional leadership, and the end users.

It means using content, media, executive outreach, customer proof, analyst-style thinking, events, sales touchpoints, and account intelligence as one coordinated system.

The point is not to run a generic brand campaign.

The point is to make sure that when the buying group reaches the moment of decision, your company is not a stranger.

This is where mid-sized challengers usually fall short.

They may have good sellers. They may have a strong product. They may even have a persuasive founder.

But they are trying to win enterprise-level decisions without enterprise-level support around the deal.

The rainmaker compensates for that gap manually. They call the right person. They write the follow-up. They brief the executive. They handle the objection. They adjust the story. They sense political risk before anyone else sees it.

That works until the company needs to win more deals than the rainmaker can personally carry.

Then growth stalls.

AI is changing the economics

Historically, orchestration was too expensive for most mid-sized companies.

A Fortune 500 could afford the researchers, media buyers, content teams, analysts, agencies, and internal specialists. A €40 million challenger could not.

That is changing.

AI is collapsing the cost of research, content production, stakeholder mapping, message adaptation, and account-level analysis. Work that once required several specialist teams can now be done by a much smaller group with the right tooling and process.

That does not mean AI closes the deal.

It means AI can help build the system around the people who do.

The rainmaker still matters. Senior judgment still matters. Relationships still matter. But the company no longer has to rely on one person carrying the entire buying group on their back.

AI makes it possible to scale parts of the rainmaker’s environment: the research, the stakeholder intelligence, the message tailoring, the content, the timing, the account-level coordination.

That is the real opportunity.

Not replacing salespeople.

Multiplying the few people who already know how to win.

The real question CEOs should ask

When a company misses its number, the boardroom question is usually predictable.

“Who do we need to hire?”

That question is not wrong. Sometimes the company does need more salespeople.

But it is often incomplete.

For complex B2B companies, the better question is:

“How do we surround our most important deals with the same seriousness a Fortune 500 would?”

That question leads somewhere different.

It forces the company to ask whether it actually knows every stakeholder in the buying group. It forces marketing to work on live deal progression, not just quarterly campaigns. It forces sales to stop treating influence as something that happens only in meetings. It forces leadership to stop pretending that a CRM field called “decision-maker” captures the reality of a 47-person buying group.

It also changes how budgets are allocated.

Instead of spending all the money on another senior seller and hoping they become a rainmaker, the company might spend part of that budget building the system that helps existing rainmakers move more deals at once.

That could mean better account research. Better stakeholder mapping. Better content targeted to specific decision roles. Better executive engagement. Better paid distribution into named accounts. Better coordination between sales, marketing, product, and leadership.

None of that sounds as simple as “hire three more reps.”

But it is much closer to how large deals are actually won.

The companies that move first will compound the advantage

I do not think this stays optional for long.

In finite, high-value B2B markets, the companies that become known first will have a structural advantage. They will enter buying processes with trust already in place. They will spend less time explaining who they are. They will face fewer internal objections from stakeholders they have never met. They will look safer, more credible, and more inevitable.

Their competitors will show up late and call it a sales problem.

The CEO I mentioned at the start hired the three salespeople anyway. Some of that hiring was useful. Most of it did not solve the real issue.

Six months later, she told me she wished she had spent half the headcount budget differently.

I knew what she meant.

Her company did not need more people chasing deals the old way. It needed a better system around the deals that mattered most.

That is the lesson for a lot of mid-sized B2B companies right now.

You can keep trying to land complex deals one at a time by hand. You can keep depending on the founder, the CRO, or the one seller who somehow knows how to get the deal unstuck.

But eventually, the math catches up.

In complex B2B, being known by the buying group before the buying process begins is not a marketing luxury. It is commercial infrastructure.

And if your biggest deals keep depending on the same two or three people, you probably do not have a sales problem.

You have an orchestration problem.

—

Christopher Engman is the founder of Njord and co-author of the Megadeals book series. He has spent more than twenty years selling to Fortune 500 companies and studying how they win their biggest deals.